Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Qwen Plus
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 52.4.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1328 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1303 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Qwen Plus?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Qwen Plus share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.