Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.4 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 42.6 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1419 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1417 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1383 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1398 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1405 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1389 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1423 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.