Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs o3-mini
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and o3-mini in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 27.8 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 36.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-12-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $4.40 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 51 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.2 (#119), o3-mini: 41.4 (#116)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1419 | 1378 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 60.4% |
| SciCode | — | 39.8% |
| GSO | — | 1.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 82.7% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o3-mini: 29.3 (#79)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 22.5% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 27.8 (#96), o3-mini: 16.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1417 | 1366 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 22.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 34.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.6% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |
| DTBench | — | 68.8% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 70.6% |
| LMCA | — | 19% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.6 |
| LiveBench | — | 75.9% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o3-mini: 27.6 (#236)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 76.9% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 96.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 12.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, o3-mini: 38.3 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 77% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 17.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1364 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.1 (#78), o3-mini: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.5 (#118), o3-mini: 45.9 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1383 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1379 |
| LMArena French | — | 1333 |
| LMArena German | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1321 |
Instruction Following o3-mini leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.9 (#110), o3-mini: 75.3 (#67)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1398 | 1338 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 84.4% |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#110), o3-mini: 33.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1405 | 1343 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 50% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.4 (#95), o3-mini: 50.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | o3-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1407 | 1337 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1389 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1423 | 1320 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 61.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 50.7% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than o3-mini?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or o3-mini better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.2 vs 41.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and o3-mini share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.