Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Muse Glimmer
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Muse Glimmer in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 25.7.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1417 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1386 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Muse Glimmer: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1390 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Muse Glimmer?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Muse Glimmer share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.