Noometry

Model comparison

Seed 2.0 Pro vs MiMo-V2-Flash

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Seed 2.0 Pro ByteDance Seed

43.2

Rank #96 Confirmed

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Seed 2.0 Pro leads 43.5 to 36.1.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.50 / $3 for Seed 2.0 Pro.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Seed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
ProviderByteDance SeedXiaomi
Noometry Index43.241.3
Released2026-02-142025-12-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window256K262K
Max output128K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.50$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$3$0.28
Results tracked2021

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.5 (#86), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Coding14721443
LMArena WebDev—1330
SciCode—25.9%
ALE-Bench—737.95

Reasoning Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 24.1 (#165), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14531420
NYT Connections (extended)28.4%—
CritPt—0%
Thematic Generalization57.1%—

Math Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 39.3 (#108), MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Math14391396

Knowledge Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 40.2 (#122), MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Expert14401425

Multimodal Not comparable

Seed 2.0 Pro: 41.5 (#35), MiMo-V2-Flash: —

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Vision1274—

Multilingual Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 54.5 (#39), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Non-English14411392
LMArena Chinese14891462
LMArena French14711429
LMArena German14421395
LMArena Japanese14081325
LMArena Korean14111358
LMArena Russian14491387
LMArena Spanish14601420

Instruction Following Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 74.5 (#91), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14141392

Long Context Too close to call

Seed 2.0 Pro: 43.6 (#90), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Longer Query14281409

Writing & Preference Seed 2.0 Pro leads

Seed 2.0 Pro: 62.9 (#69), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

BenchmarkSeed 2.0 ProMiMo-V2-Flash
LMArena Text14481411
LMArena Creative Writing14061375
LMArena Multi-Turn14411404

Frequently asked questions

Is Seed 2.0 Pro better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

Seed 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index. MiMo-V2-Flash costs 6.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Seed 2.0 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Seed 2.0 Pro lists at $0.50 and $3.

Is Seed 2.0 Pro or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

Seed 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Seed 2.0 Pro and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Seed 2.0 Pro has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper