Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Qwen3 Max

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Qwen3 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

43.7

Rank #87 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 37.0.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen3 Max specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.343.7
Released—2025-09-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Coding13611456
ALE-Bench—370.45

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Qwen3 Max: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
Vending-Bench 2—71.56

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13741448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—72.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—30.1%
Chess Puzzles—4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—5%
DTBench—82.1%
LMCA—28.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.38

Math Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Math13591446
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—73.3%
MATH Level 5—97.1%

Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Expert13391455
GPQA Diamond—72.6%
SimpleQA Verified—48.7%

Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Non-English13631429
LMArena Chinese14171478
LMArena French13911449
LMArena German13551463
LMArena Japanese13421397
LMArena Korean13511399
LMArena Russian13681428
LMArena Spanish—1462

Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13441419

Long Context Too close to call

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Longer Query13661438
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—14.5%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Qwen3 Max
LMArena Text13771439
LMArena Creative Writing13591402
LMArena Multi-Turn13871446

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Qwen3 Max?

Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?

Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Qwen3 Max share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper