Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 37.0.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index41.343.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1641

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding13611469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts13741447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Math13591429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert13391461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English13631420
LMArena Chinese14171463
LMArena French13911447
LMArena German13551426
LMArena Japanese13421381
LMArena Korean13511372
LMArena Russian13681428
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following13441433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query13661445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiniMax-M3
LMArena Text13771433
LMArena Creative Writing13591404
LMArena Multi-Turn13871442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiniMax-M3 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper