Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 37.0.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
Grok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index43.841.3
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4016

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14151361
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts13961374
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math13881359
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert13851339
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English13851363
LMArena Chinese14221417
LMArena French14121391
LMArena German13951355
LMArena Japanese13791342
LMArena Korean13561351
LMArena Russian13991368
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following13661344

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query13931366

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text13971377
LMArena Creative Writing13801359
LMArena Multi-Turn14061387
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper