Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 37.0.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Spark specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index41.350.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1627

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Coding13611481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts13741474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Math13591455
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Expert13391457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Non-English13631464
LMArena Chinese14171509
LMArena French13911497
LMArena German13551497
LMArena Korean13511459
LMArena Russian13681466
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following13441442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Longer Query13661451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Muse Spark
LMArena Text13771474
LMArena Creative Writing13591459
LMArena Multi-Turn13871477

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Spark share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper