Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Muse Glimmer
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 1 category and Muse Glimmer in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Muse Glimmer has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 41.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1416 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |
| SciCode | — | 44.9% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1396 |
| CritPt | — | 2.6% |
Math Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1417 |
Knowledge Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1386 |
Multilingual Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following Muse Glimmer leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Muse Glimmer?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 40.4); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Muse Glimmer share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.