Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Muse Glimmer
MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Muse Glimmer in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Muse Glimmer leads 40.4 to 36.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 44.9% for Muse Glimmer.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 41.7 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2026-08-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 66K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Glimmer leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Muse Glimmer: 40.4 (#142)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | 1355 |
| SciCode | 25.9% | 44.9% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1416 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Muse Glimmer: 25.7 (#144)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 2.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1396 |
Math Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Muse Glimmer: 38.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1417 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Muse Glimmer: 38.5 (#143)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1386 |
Multilingual Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Muse Glimmer: 50.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1390 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | — |
| LMArena German | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Muse Glimmer: 72.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1375 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1382 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Muse Glimmer: 57.5 (#126)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1399 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Muse Glimmer?
MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Glimmer score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.3 vs 41.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Muse Glimmer better for coding?
Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Muse Glimmer share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 15.