Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mixtral 8x22B

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x22B Mistral AI

26.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 8 categories and Mixtral 8x22B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 36.4 to 15.1.
  • Mixtral 8x22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mixtral 8x22B specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index40.626.7
Released—2024-04-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—64K
Max output—64K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1634

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Mixtral 8x22B: 23.8 (#324)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Coding13611166
WeirdML—3.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—40.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—50.2%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—64.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Mixtral 8x22B: 22.8 (#119)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
Cybench—7.5%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Mixtral 8x22B: 19.1 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741150
DTBench—55.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122
ForecastBench—56.3

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Mixtral 8x22B: 21.2 (#271)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Math13591184
Omni-MATH—16.3%
MATH Level 5—24.2%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Mixtral 8x22B: 15.1 (#288)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Expert13381113
GPQA Diamond—34.1%
MMLU-Pro—46%
GPQA (HELM)—33.4%
MMLU—77.8%

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Mixtral 8x22B: 32.9 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Non-English13621128
LMArena Chinese14161116
LMArena French13901165
LMArena German13561141
LMArena Japanese13381037
LMArena Korean13511056
LMArena Russian13681158
LMArena Spanish—1150

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Mixtral 8x22B: 57.9 (#261)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Instruction Following13441147
IFEval—72.4%

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Mixtral 8x22B: 34.6 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Longer Query13651144

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Mixtral 8x22B: 37.1 (#257)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mixtral 8x22B
LMArena Text13771162
LMArena Creative Writing13581141
LMArena Multi-Turn13871130
WildBench—71.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mixtral 8x22B?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 26.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mixtral 8x22B better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 23.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mixtral 8x22B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x22B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper