Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mistral Medium

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Medium in 4 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 36.4 to 24.9.
  • Mistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index40.636.0
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1636

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Mistral Medium: 33.8 (#241)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Coding13611434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#84)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Mistral Medium: 23.3 (#165)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts13741426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Mistral Medium: 27.2 (#238)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Math13591409
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—32.2%
ProofBench—9%
MATH Level 5—81.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Mistral Medium: 24.9 (#260)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Expert13381408
GPQA Diamond—59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Mistral Medium: 34.6 (#82)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Vision—1172

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Mistral Medium: 52.3 (#86)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13621408
LMArena Chinese14161448
LMArena French13901460
LMArena German13561433
LMArena Japanese13381378
LMArena Korean13511382
LMArena Russian13681411
LMArena Spanish—1433

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Mistral Medium: 73.9 (#111)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following13441398

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#108)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query13651406

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Mistral Medium: 60.2 (#97)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Mistral Medium
LMArena Text13771424
LMArena Creative Writing13581391
LMArena Multi-Turn13871418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mistral Medium?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 36.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mistral Medium share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper