Model comparison
MiMo-V2-Flash vs Mistral Medium
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and Mistral Medium in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 25.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 40.2% for Mistral Medium.
- MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.50 / $7.50 for Mistral Medium.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2025-12-16 | 2023-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 25.9% | 40.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1443 | 1434 |
| ALE-Bench | 737.95 | 763.98 |
| FrontierCode | — | 8% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1330 | — |
| WeirdML | — | 43.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.7% |
Reasoning Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1420 | 1426 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 50% |
| DTBench | — | 75.5% |
| LMCA | — | 26.1% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 26.9% |
Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1408 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 32.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 9% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 81.6% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 0.3% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1425 | 1408 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 59.5% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 4.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 22.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2-Flash: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1172 |
Multilingual Mistral Medium leads
MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1392 | 1408 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1462 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1429 | 1459 |
| LMArena German | 1395 | 1432 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1325 | 1378 |
| LMArena Korean | 1358 | 1380 |
| LMArena Russian | 1387 | 1411 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1420 | 1433 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1392 | 1398 |
Long Context Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1409 | 1406 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2-Flash | Mistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1411 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1375 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1404 | 1418 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 77.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than Mistral Medium?
MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Medium?
MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium lists at $1.50 and $7.50.
Is MiMo-V2-Flash or Mistral Medium better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and Mistral Medium share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.