Model comparison
Command A vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 39.3 to 26.8.
- Command A has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 40.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 26.8 (#317), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1331 | 1361 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.7 (#36), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 17.7 (#276), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1374 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 33.5 (#172), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1359 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Command A: 36.5 (#157), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1338 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 45.5 (#166), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1416 |
| LMArena French | 1352 | 1390 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1283 | 1338 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1346 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 69.3 (#172), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1344 |
Long Context Too close to call
Command A: 40.6 (#147), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1365 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Command A: 47.8 (#204), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)
| Benchmark | Command A | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1358 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1338 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.3 versus 26.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.