Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiniMax-M2.7
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 25.9.
- MiniMax-M2.7 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 37.7 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 30 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1422 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | 1444 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
Multilingual MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | 1391 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1355 | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 1405 |
Long Context MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1419 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.7 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiniMax-M2.7?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?
MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiniMax-M2.7 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.