Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite Google

37.8

Rank #194 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 22.0.

Side by side

Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.841.3
Released2025-02-05—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3216

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding13221361
LiveBench Coding47.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts13241374
LiveBench Reasoning50.1%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis65.5%—
ForecastBench57.1—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math13091359
Omni-MATH37.4%—
LiveBench Math58.1%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert13051339
MMLU-Pro72%—
GPQA (HELM)50%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1100—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English13231363
LMArena Chinese13391417
LMArena French13471391
LMArena German13061355
LMArena Japanese13011342
LMArena Korean13251351
LMArena Russian13281368
LMArena Spanish1313—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following13051344
LiveBench Instruction Following78.3%—
IFEval82.4%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query13201366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

BenchmarkGemini 2.0 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text13301377
LMArena Creative Writing13191359
LMArena Multi-Turn13071387
WildBench79%—
LiveBench Language34.3%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper