Noometry

Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Flash Xiaomi

41.3

Rank #138 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.7 MiniMax

37.7

Rank #196 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher in 5 categories and MiniMax-M2.7 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 38.3 to 25.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 25.9% for MiMo-V2-Flash and 47% for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.7.
  • MiMo-V2-Flash accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index41.337.7
Released2025-12-162026-03-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output66K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked2130

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.7 leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211), MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena WebDev13301398
SciCode25.9%47%
LMArena Coding14431454
ALE-Bench737.95599.25
WeirdML—37%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Flash: —, MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
Terminal-Bench—45.1%
ExploitBench—13.3%
GBAEval—0%

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157), MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
CritPt0%0.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts14201422
NYT Connections (extended)—24.7%
Thematic Generalization—39.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—145.85

Math MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139), MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Math13961420
ProofBench—3%

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Flash leads

MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131), MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Expert14251444
Vectara Hallucination Rate—12.9%

Multilingual Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113), MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Non-English13921382
LMArena Chinese14621441
LMArena French14291421
LMArena German13951398
LMArena Japanese13251262
LMArena Korean13581313
LMArena Russian13871383
LMArena Spanish14201403

Instruction Following Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120), MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Instruction Following13921405

Long Context Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110), MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Longer Query14091419

Writing & Preference Too close to call

MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106), MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

BenchmarkMiMo-V2-FlashMiniMax-M2.7
LMArena Text14111405
LMArena Creative Writing13751354
LMArena Multi-Turn14041412

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Flash better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M2.7?

MiMo-V2-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.7 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Flash or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Flash does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Flash and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper