Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Flash Xiaomi

48.5

Rank #55 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 37.5.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index41.348.5
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.28
Results tracked1619

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Coding13611504
LMArena WebDev—1637
SciCode—51.3%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13741482
CritPt—12%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Math13591468
ProofBench—63%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Expert13391501

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Vision—1259

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Non-English13631434
LMArena Chinese14171511
LMArena French13911475
LMArena Russian13681409
LMArena German1355—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1351—
LMArena Spanish—1456

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13441463

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13661463

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226MiMo-V2.6-Flash
LMArena Text13771455
LMArena Creative Writing13591400
LMArena Multi-Turn13871451

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper