Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4 xAI

47.8

Rank #49 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 leads 63.1 to 41.6.

Side by side

Grok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index47.840.6
Released2025-07-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 49.9 (#44), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding14081361
Aider Polyglot79.6%—
WeirdML45.7%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4: 32.1 (#62), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Terminal-Bench27.2%—
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard63%—
GDPval21.1%—
Cybench43%—
DeepResearch Bench47.3%—
BALROG43.6%—
LMArena Search1142—
METR Time Horizons66.6%—

Reasoning Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 36.9 (#59), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts14091374
ARC-AGI-216%—
SimpleBench60.5%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark73.6%—
ARC-AGI-166.7%—
Chess Puzzles28%—
Epoch Capabilities Index146.46—
ForecastBench60.9—

Math Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 46.5 (#58), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math14221359
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202584%—
Omni-MATH60.3%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)19.7%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)2.1%—

Knowledge Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 53.7 (#50), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert14171338
GPQA Diamond87%—
MMLU-Pro85.1%—
Confabulations12.4%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4: 33.1 (#89), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Vision1211—
GeoBench45%—

Multilingual Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 52.0 (#98), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English14031362
LMArena Chinese14281416
LMArena French14181390
LMArena German14291356
LMArena Japanese13961338
LMArena Korean13761351
LMArena Russian14091368
LMArena Spanish1419—

Instruction Following Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 79.4 (#4), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following13871344
IFEval94.9%—

Long Context Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 63.1 (#4), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query14091365
Fiction.LiveBench94.4%—

Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads

Grok 4: 58.7 (#111), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)

BenchmarkGrok 4Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text14121377
LMArena Creative Writing13971358
LMArena Multi-Turn14161387
Short-Story Creative Writing76.9%—
WildBench79.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4 has 48 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper