Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 53.4 to 40.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $0.90 for GLM-4.6V.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 48.5 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1482 |
| CritPt | — | 12% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: —, MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 63% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1468 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | 1501 |
Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1259 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1511 |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | 1409 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1463 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1463 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1451 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.6V or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM-4.6V lists at $0.30 and $0.90.
Is GLM-4.6V or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.