Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Mercury 2.5
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 33.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 260K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.04 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.15 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Mercury 2.5: 39.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 301.65 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Mercury 2.5: 22.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Mercury 2.5: 23.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | 1359 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Mercury 2.5: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Mercury 2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Mercury 2.5?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Mercury 2.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.0 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Mercury 2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2.5 has 4.