Model comparison
GPT-4.1 mini vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.1 mini scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 27.8 to 10.8.
Side by side
| GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-04-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Results tracked | 47 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 30.6 (#293), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1367 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 23.9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 32.4% | — |
| SciCode | 40.4% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| CadEval | 16% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 33.3 (#55), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 50.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 10.8 (#340), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1349 | 1374 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 48.6% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 3.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 7% | — |
| DTBench | 68.8% | — |
| LMCA | 21.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 135.01 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 24.1 (#270), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1343 | 1359 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 6.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 44.7% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 49.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 87.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 34.7 (#194), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1338 | 1339 |
| GPQA Diamond | 65.8% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 12.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 61.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GPT-4.1 mini: 35.8 (#82), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1181 | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 45.7 (#166), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1329 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1358 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1351 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1290 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1298 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1324 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1319 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 mini leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 73.7 (#118), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1333 | 1344 |
| IFEval | 90.4% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 31.8 (#275), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1344 | 1366 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 44.4% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4.1 mini: 48.6 (#199), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-4.1 mini | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1340 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1300 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1354 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| WildBench | 83.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4.1 mini better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4.1 mini or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 30.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4.1 mini and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.1 mini has 47 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.