Model comparison

Deepseek Coder v2 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Deepseek Coder v2 DeepSeek

35.9

Rank #220 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

41.3

Rank #139 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 38.2.
  • Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Deepseek Coder v2 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 specifications
Deepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderDeepSeekTencent
Noometry Index35.941.3
Released2024-06-17—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked2416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding12511361
BigCodeBench Instruct48.2%—
BigCodeBench Complete59.7%—
HumanEval+82.3%—
MBPP+75.1%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Hard Prompts12071374
WinoGrande83.7%—

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Math12411359
GSM8K94.5%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Expert11811339
ARC (AI2) Challenge64.3%—

Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English11821363
LMArena Chinese12011417
LMArena French11851391
LMArena German11641355
LMArena Japanese11261342
LMArena Korean11041351
LMArena Russian11881368
LMArena Spanish1153—

Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following11801344

Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query12191366

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepseek Coder v2Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text11911377
LMArena Creative Writing11201359
LMArena Multi-Turn11771387

Frequently asked questions

Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper