Model comparison
GPT-4 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 10.8.
Side by side
| GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-03-14 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $60 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 31.6 (#283), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1254 | 1361 |
| WeirdML | 12.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 46% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 57.2% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 79.3% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| METR Time Horizons | 36.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 17.8 (#289), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1241 | 1374 |
| Chess Puzzles | 4% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 12% | — |
| DTBench | 62.7% | — |
| LMCA | 17.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 75.1% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 125.89 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.8 | — |
| HellaSwag | 95.3% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.5% | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 10.8 (#309), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 23% | — |
| GSM8K | 92% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 18.4 (#282), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1339 |
| GPQA Diamond | 35.7% | — |
| MMLU | 86.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 84.8% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 40.6 (#215), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1246 | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | 1417 |
| LMArena French | 1283 | 1391 |
| LMArena German | 1251 | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1209 | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | 1184 | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | 1251 | 1368 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1261 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 65.3 (#222), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1241 | 1344 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 37.7 (#212), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1244 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
GPT-4: 34.9 (#268), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-4 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1244 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1257 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 752 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4 or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4 has 38 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.