Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Llama 13b
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 57.4 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 683 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1359 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1339 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1363 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1417 | — |
| LMArena French | 1391 | — |
| LMArena German | 1355 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1368 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1344 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1359 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1387 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Llama 13b?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.