Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.5 to 9.3.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 25.0 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude 2: 21.7 (#216), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.13 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude 2: 9.3 (#320), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Claude 2: 16.9 (#287), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 25.0 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.