Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #57 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Inkling-Small leads 39.0 to 26.7.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
ProviderTencentThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index40.646.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1633

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148), Inkling-Small: 43.3 (#80)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Coding13611451
LMArena WebDev—1408
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115), Inkling-Small: 39.0 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13741424
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.13

Math Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155), Inkling-Small: 44.9 (#65)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Math13591453
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158), Inkling-Small: 48.3 (#71)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Expert13381442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —, Inkling-Small: 38.4 (#59)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Vision—1235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#102)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Non-English13621400
LMArena Chinese14161458
LMArena French13901438
LMArena German13561412
LMArena Japanese13381399
LMArena Korean13511355
LMArena Russian13681392
LMArena Spanish—1426

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153), Inkling-Small: 73.9 (#112)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following13441397

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#113)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query13651401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125), Inkling-Small: 59.8 (#102)

BenchmarkHunyuan Turbos 20250226Inkling-Small
LMArena Text13771413
LMArena Creative Writing13581330
LMArena Multi-Turn13871420
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 and Inkling-Small share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper