Model comparison
GPT-5 Pro vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5 Pro leads 56.7 to 37.0.
Side by side
| GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 46.4 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-10-06 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 272K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $120 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 44.0 (#80), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1361 |
| AlgoTune | 1.31 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 38.9 (#62), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 18.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 61.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 76.8% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 70.2% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 18.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1374 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 150.28 | — |
Math GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 48.5 (#63), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 55.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 19.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1359 |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 14.6% | — |
Knowledge GPT-5 Pro leads
GPT-5 Pro: 56.7 (#42), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 31.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1339 |
Multilingual Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1368 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1344 |
Long Context Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GPT-5 Pro: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | GPT-5 Pro | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1387 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5 Pro better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
GPT-5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.4 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-5 Pro or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
GPT-5 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5 Pro and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5 Pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.