Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
StepFunSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Step 3.5 Flash in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 58.8 to 50.2.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 42.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1436 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1421 |
Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1447 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1419 |
Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1385 |
Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1402 |
Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Step 3.5 Flash share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.