Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Step 3.5 Flash
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 2 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 42.8.
- Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 42.3 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2026-01-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1436 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1411 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 28.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Step 3.5 Flash leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1408 |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 66.8% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1421 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Step 3.5 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1447 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1421 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1405 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1354 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1352 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1385 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1419 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1385 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1402 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Step 3.5 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1403 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1357 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Step 3.5 Flash?
Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Step 3.5 Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.