Model comparison

Nova 2 Lite vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Nova 2 Lite Amazon

39.7

Rank #161 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

42.3

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Nova 2 Lite scores higher in 2 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nova 2 Lite leads 27.5 to 22.2.
  • Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Nova 2 Lite.
  • Nova 2 Lite accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Nova 2 Lite and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Nova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
ProviderAmazonStepFun
Noometry Index39.742.3
Released2025-12-012026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M256K
Max output64K256K
Input $ / M tokens$0.30$0.10
Output $ / M tokens$2.50$0.30
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.7 (#134), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.4 (#105)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding13851436

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Nova 2 Lite: 24.1 (#121), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard27.1%—

Reasoning Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 27.5 (#118), Step 3.5 Flash: 22.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts13641411
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 37.5 (#156), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.6 (#84)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math13591408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%

Knowledge Nova 2 Lite leads

Nova 2 Lite: 43.0 (#94), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert13581421
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—

Multilingual Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 47.1 (#153), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.5 (#119)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English13371385
LMArena Chinese13641447
LMArena French13811421
LMArena German13431405
LMArena Japanese12711354
LMArena Korean12841352
LMArena Russian13431385
LMArena Spanish13731419

Instruction Following Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 70.5 (#161), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.1 (#124)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following13351385

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 40.6 (#150), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#117)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query13351402

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Nova 2 Lite: 53.9 (#154), Step 3.5 Flash: 58.8 (#113)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkNova 2 LiteStep 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text13621403
LMArena Creative Writing12911357
LMArena Multi-Turn13381405

Frequently asked questions

Is Nova 2 Lite better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Nova 2 Lite or Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Nova 2 Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.

Is Nova 2 Lite or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova 2 Lite does, with 1M tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Nova 2 Lite and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Nova 2 Lite has 19 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper