Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Qwen Plus
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 37.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1347 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1323 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1303 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Qwen Plus?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Qwen Plus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Qwen Plus share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.