Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen Plus
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen Plus in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 37.5 to 23.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 57.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 58 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1328 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1317 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | 1.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1328 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena German | 1301 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1324 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1336 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Qwen Plus?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen Plus share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.