Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite Google

37.0

Rank #211 Confirmed

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 Tencent

39.6

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite scores higher in 4 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads 56.8 to 50.2.

Side by side

Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index37.039.6
Released2025-06-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.10—
Output $ / M tokens$0.40—
Results tracked3311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.5 (#173), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Coding13731319
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench325.9—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 28.0 (#96), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard36.9%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 22.2 (#205), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Hard Prompts13771308
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.5%—
DTBench62.8%—
LMCA18.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index133.94—

Math Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 38.0 (#144), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Math13731273
Omni-MATH48%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 32.5 (#210), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
MMLU-Pro53.7%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate3.3%—
GPQA (HELM)30.9%—
LMArena Expert1373—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 29.1 (#114), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Vision1198—
VPCT30%—

Multilingual Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 49.3 (#134), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Non-English13691285
LMArena Chinese14041358
LMArena Russian13731305
LMArena French1388—
LMArena German1389—
LMArena Japanese1359—
LMArena Korean1360—
LMArena Spanish1396—

Instruction Following Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 70.0 (#168), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Instruction Following13671278
IFEval81%—

Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 33.3 (#262), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Longer Query13731309
Fiction.LiveBench47.2%—

Writing & Preference Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite: 56.8 (#135), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 2.5 Flash-LiteHunyuan Turbo 0110
LMArena Text13791311
LMArena Creative Writing13671269
LMArena Multi-Turn13661303
WildBench81.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 38.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite has 33 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper