Model comparison
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 5 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.6 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 11 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1319 | 1347 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1308 | 1322 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1273 | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1358 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1305 | 1268 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1299 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1309 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1269 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1303 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.6 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Hunyuan Turbo 0110 or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.6 vs 39.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Turbo 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.