Model comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 50.3 to 39.9.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.5 | 39.4 |
| Released | 2025-02-24 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 58 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1361 | 1347 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 61% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 52.8% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 64.9% | — |
| GSO | 3.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 74.5% | — |
| CadEval | 54% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 30.9% | — |
| Cybench | 20% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 43.6% | — |
| OSWorld | 35.8% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 60% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1333 | 1322 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.9% | — |
| SimpleBench | 46.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 28.6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 4.2% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 87.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 74% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.16 | — |
| ForecastBench | 61.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 76.1% | — |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1337 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 57.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 33% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 79% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 91.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 4.1% | — |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1321 | 1308 |
| GPQA Diamond | 79.7% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.4% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.7% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 60.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1169 | — |
| GeoBench | 68% | — |
| VPCT | 39% | — |
| SpatialViz-Bench | 33.9% | — |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1296 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1299 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1301 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1249 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1311 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1298 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1267 | — |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1299 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 81.3% | — |
| IFEval | 83.4% | — |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1373 | 1312 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1314 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1332 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1309 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.1% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1412 | — |
| WildBench | 81.4% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 59.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.5 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 39.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.