Model comparison
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.1 to 25.4.
Side by side
| DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-12-01 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.58 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.68 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1346 |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1322 |
Math Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1307 |
Multilingual Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena French | — | 1328 |
| LMArena German | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1337 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1298 |
Long Context Not comparable
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1264 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.1 vs 38.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.