Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Step 3
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
StepFunSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Step 3 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 54.3.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 40.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1367 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1366 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1331 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1332 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Step 3?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Step 3 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Step 3 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.