Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiniMax M1
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax M1 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 53.3.
- MiniMax M1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 39.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), MiniMax M1: 39.2 (#149)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1359 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), MiniMax M1: 25.8 (#125)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1340 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), MiniMax M1: 34.8 (#152)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1360 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), MiniMax M1: 35.7 (#168)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1316 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), MiniMax M1: 46.0 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1361 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1263 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1330 |
| LMArena French | — | 1369 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1220 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1354 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), MiniMax M1: 69.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1312 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), MiniMax M1: 53.3 (#155)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1335 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiniMax M1?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.2 vs 39.2); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiniMax M1 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.