Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
NVIDIASummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B in 0 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 52.3.
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 40.6 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 262K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 40.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1378 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 27.1 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1348 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 37.8 (#147)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1371 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 38.2 (#148)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1355 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.6% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 45.8 (#162)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1320 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1382 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1269 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1303 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1376 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 68.8 (#180)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1304 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 39.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1300 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: 52.3 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1348 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1319 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 40.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 40.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has 18.