Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 Max in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 38.1.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 43.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Qwen3 Max: 42.4 (#93)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1456 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Qwen3 Max: 22.0 (#186)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1448 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.41 |
Math Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Qwen3 Max: 37.6 (#94)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1447 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1457 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Qwen3 Max: 53.9 (#58)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1479 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | — | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1463 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Qwen3 Max: 75.0 (#81)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1420 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#129)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Qwen3 Max: 62.6 (#72)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1446 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 40.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3 Max share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.