Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 38.8.
  • MiniMax-M3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
ProviderTencentMiniMax
Noometry Index42.543.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1341

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding13901469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts13991447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Math14141429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert13951461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English13951420
LMArena Chinese14251463
LMArena Korean14061372
LMArena Russian13851428
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following13741433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query13841445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711MiniMax-M3
LMArena Text14011433
LMArena Creative Writing13921404
LMArena Multi-Turn13931442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiniMax-M3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper