Model comparison

Grok 4.3 vs Hunyuan T1 20250711

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.3 scores higher in 5 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 38.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 specifications
Grok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index43.842.5
Released2026-04-17—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M—
Max output30K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.25—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked4013

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Coding14151390
LMArena WebDev1357—
SciCode47.3%—
WeirdML49.9%—
ALE-Bench944.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
GDP.pdf8%—
LMArena Search1165—
Vending-Bench 235.26—

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Hard Prompts13961399
NYT Connections (extended)55.2%—
CritPt8%—
Chess Puzzles25%—
DTBench90.7%—
LMCA38.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.16—
ForecastBench60.3—

Math Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Math13881414
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)42.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 414.6%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench11%—

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Expert13851395
GPQA Diamond88.8%—
SimpleQA Verified33.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Vision1229—
Blueprint-Bench 20%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Non-English13851395
LMArena Chinese14221425
LMArena Korean13561406
LMArena Russian13991385
LMArena French1412—
LMArena German1395—
LMArena Japanese1379—
LMArena Spanish1398—

Instruction Following Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Instruction Following13661374

Long Context Too close to call

Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Longer Query13931384

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.3Hunyuan T1 20250711
LMArena Text13971401
LMArena Creative Writing13801392
LMArena Multi-Turn14061393
EQ-Bench 41075—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.3 better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.3 or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 40.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.3 and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper