Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3 8B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 16.6.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 33.7 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3 8B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.