Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 20.8.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1390 |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1399 |
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| DTBench | 65.2% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | — |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1283 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1318 | — |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.