Model comparison
Codellama 70b Instruct vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Meta
TencentSummary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Codellama 70b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 51.2 to 24.8.
- Codellama 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#193), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 40.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 49.6% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 65.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 20.1 (#242), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1052 | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 24.8 (#288), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 992 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1385 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 51.9 (#293), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1024 | 1374 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codellama 70b Instruct: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codellama 70b Instruct: 33.4 (#277), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Codellama 70b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1057 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codellama 70b Instruct better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codellama 70b Instruct or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codellama 70b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codellama 70b Instruct has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.