Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3.7 Max
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 38.7.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 51.5 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 85.1% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |
Math Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1484 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1460 |
Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1482 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3.7 Max?
Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.7 Max share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.