Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 57.6 to 38.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.551.5
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked1329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Coding13901471
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Hard Prompts13991457
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.24

Math Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Math14141465
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Expert13951478
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English13951437
LMArena Chinese14251487
LMArena Russian13851445
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following13741438

Long Context Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query13841457

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text14011447
LMArena Creative Writing13921435
LMArena Multi-Turn13931456

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 42.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen3.6 Max Preview better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 40.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper