Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 41.8.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 32.9 |
| Released | — | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 33K |
| Max output | — | 29K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.66 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 31 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.41 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1251 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.